🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers introduced a new playlist titled Relaxed Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option mirrors the regular Breakthrough setup but includes a few notable changes:

• Every squad has just eight real players, with the remaining made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions done by real players award full XP, while AI activities provide lower rewards.
• Just a pair of maps are available: Cairo Siege and Empire State map.
• Elements like Dogtags, achievements, and career stat updates have been turned off.

So essentially, the playlist lives up to its title: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. On the surface, one could assume it's a good idea, since it provides additional choices for players seeking alternative ways to have fun with the game. But, gaming history have taught us anything, it is that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, many Battlefield 6 fans are upset.

Player Responses: From Fury to Support

"People want real players. Don't repeat the mistakes of your rivals," reads a response to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing idea," comments a different user. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player remarks, "I have no idea where we are going with this game," and another details everything they consider to be broken in the game: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, fix awful hit registration. We do not require this bot mode."

On the other hand, for every complaint, some gamers sharing how much they're liking the new mode. "It's very fun to warm up, human participants keep it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "This subreddit fails to see that there are gamers who have lives and can't play this game 24/7. Allow them to find a middle ground," states another. A response on Twitter explains that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is great for me," while another praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Concerns and Player Input

Despite the support, players have constructive reasons to criticize Casual Breakthrough. Some users have pointed out that it will make wait times more extended for different playlists because of the large amount of options in the game already. Similarly, certain regions already encounter AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a required amount of human gamers, despite it focuses mostly on combat against bots.

Lastly, a major grievances is that a previous feature was promised to provide complete rewards, even against bots, but that was removed when they attempted to remove XP farming from the system. Thus this new playlist seems like the player base compromising in the middle, as per forum feedback. A different user labels this mode as the devs "dropping the ball so hard, I experienced great enjoyment in the initial release, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Be Made?

If the development team has demonstrated something so far with Battlefield 6, it is that they're listening and acting on player input. Tasks that were overly hard were adjusted very quickly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data shows this new playlist isn't performing to their expectations, they will not hesitate to change it again.