Judge Dismisses Drake's Legal Case Regarding Kendrick Lamar’s Hit Diss Track
A court official has dismissed the rapper Drake’s defamation lawsuit against the music corporation over Kendrick Lamar’s track Not Like Us.
Judge the court’s judge ruled that the rapper’s lyrics, which accused the artist and his crew of being "certified paedophiles", were "nonactionable opinion" and could not be deemed libelous.
The Canadian rapper filed the lawsuit in January, accusing UMG, the music company representing the two rappers, of defamation by allowing the track to be released and promoted, stating it disseminated a "untrue and harmful story".
The artist’s spokesperson said he planned to challenge the decision. Universal Music Group said it was pleased with the result and was looking forward to continuing its collaboration with the rapper.
Background of the Rap Battle
Not Like Us, which was initially released in spring 2024, was broadly viewed as the final strike in an continuing feud between the competing artists.
It has emerged as the most successful track of Lamar's musical journey, having received multiple Grammy awards and being one of the most-talked about moments of his Super Bowl performance in early 2025.
In a 38-page order, Judge Vargas called the dispute between the artists "the most infamous rap battle in the history of rap music".
"The artists' seven-track rap battle was a 'war of words' that was the subject of extensive press coverage and digital debate," the court noted.
"While the accusation that plaintiff is a child predator is certainly a grave allegation, the broader context of a intense musical rivalry, with incendiary language and insulting claims exchanged by both participants, would not incline the reasonable listener to believe that 'Not Like Us' imparts truthful statements about the claimant."
She additionally observed that, in an previous track, the artist had "challenged Lamar to make the paedophilia accusations" that featured in Not Like Us.
On the track Taylor Made Freestyle, the rapper used the AI-generated voice of the late rapper to suggest strategies on how to win the rap battle.
"Suggest he has a preference for minors, consider that a tip," the track suggested.
"Against this backdrop in which such lyrics as 'Say, Drake, I hear you like 'em young' must be evaluated," stated Judge Vargas.
"The similarity in the wording suggests strongly that this lyric is a clear reference to Drake's lyrics in the prior song."
'An Affront to Artists'
Drake, whose real name is Aubrey Drake Graham, did not sue Lamar in the legal filing.
His lawyers alleged UMG of initiating "a campaign to generate a viral hit" out of a track that made the "false factual allegation that Drake is a convicted predator, and to imply that the public should resort to vigilante justice in retaliation".
Deciding against the plaintiff, Judge Vargas said fans would not expect "truthful accounts" from a diss track "replete with profanity, trash-talking, threats of violence, and exaggerated statements."
She pointed out that Drake himself had engaged in similar language, referencing a lyric in which the star "heavily" suggested that "Lamar is a spouse beater", and a separate instance where Drake "raps that he 'was told' that one of his rival’s sons may not be biologically his."
Concerning Lamar's song, Judge Vargas said: "Although seemingly factual claims may take on the nature of subjective views... when made in open discourse, heated labour dispute, or other circumstances in which an listener may expect the use of epithets, passionate language or hyperbole."
Responding to the dismissal, a UMG representative said: "From the outset, this case was an affront to every creative and their creative expression and should not have been filed."
"We're pleased with the court's dismissal and are eager to resuming our partnership effectively marketing Drake's music and supporting his career," the representative added.
A spokesperson for Drake said the rapper intended to appeal the ruling, "and we look forward to the appellate court reviewing it".
Kendrick Lamar has not yet comment on the case.